But with the added steps of data collection and the added complexity of the IPMI-to-Management networking requirement countering the benefit of Ironic registration, it’s a wash for scoring. Mirantis’ ‘Unlocked’ program provides transparent procedures, templates, scripts and tools for validating hardware; OpenStack drivers and infrastructure-level solutions; and application-level and/or OpenStack API-integrated solutions. We don’t have the quantities of people trained and certified, but given Red Hat has a strong training corp around their operating system, we’ll give them the benefit of the doubt for their OpenStack training and score them equally. The requirement of a significantly greater number of CLI commands and lack of scripting offered are a disadvantage. It has control … Using the available documentation, we designed equivalent physical environments and used the exact same hardware for each distribution deployment. Upgrade – Upgrades are documented but slightly more involved than Mirantis due to the lack of tooling similar to Fuel Octane. As far as I know, Mirantis uses just the plain OpenStack software from git.openstack.org without changes. OpenStack is an Iaas (Infrastructure as a service) that is used in converting the existing servers to the cloud. Will this work? But not all players in the open source community are created equal. I made three OpenStack predictions last year: That OpenStack would see market consolidation, that enterprises would adopt OpenStack, and that OpenStack would produce a native PaaS solution. This is both the first version of their TripleO deployment model and the first version of their Director installer; both have several tripping points. Upgrading OpenStack is a long-standing pain point in operations. For more information and to download Mirantis OpenStack 7.0 to try it for yourself, visit www.mirantis.com. It is also the first version release of the documentation for TripleO and Director, and it suffers from several syntax typographical errors, and—in some areas—missing steps altogether. Mirantis scores reasonably well by leading on the open-source approach, contributions by bugs resolved, and earns points in thought leadership. The Red Hat OpenStack distribution lacks any active pre-deployment checks, so several issues were discovered only after attempting deployment. From direct user experience benefits to community direction and participation, Mirantis offers more than the other vendor, Red Hat. Mirantis could also benefit heavily from a free "light" version that start-ups could use to run their own cloud. The Mirantis distro packages some OpenStack projects, and adds Fuel, which allows you to configure your cloud and to deploy and manage the hosts that run it. Mirantis Takes On Red Hat, Canonical And HP With Its Own OpenStack Distribution. Here is a comparison along the various scoring metrics: We are going to declare this review as a draw. We are expanding the original comparison of just the software and installation to include aspects of the overall ownership experience. Mirantis – Using Fuel, existing environments are easily scaled both up and down, with automated discovery of PXE bootstrapped nodes and GUI or CLI based scaling of nodes. The only one we were able to confirm is Scale testing. This story, "Oracle, Mirantis team up to grab Red Hat's OpenStack crown," was originally published at InfoWorld.com. At any rate, these day-to-day ops tools are weighted significantly in our distribution comparison, as they bring significant value to the customer. Even though the Mirantis view is that a pure-play, user-makes-the-choice, and fluid approach in a fast-moving space make more sense, a user may disagree and prefer a fully integrated stack from one vendor. Where the two distros deviate is that Mirantis OpenStack 7.0 includes Fuel for deployment and ongoing management and as well as Murano application catalog; RHEL OSP7 includes Director for deployment and ongoing management and Ironic for bare-metal provisioning. Mirantis has a wide array of published partners across the technology silos offering pure-play options for end users in every aspect of their solution. Its strange to review your own product, dont you think? OpenStack update vs OpenStack upgrade¶. Maybe coupled with advertising or some sort of surveys. Total Steps: 48 mostly manual CLI (includes some default values, sub-steps, and one optional health verification), Total Time: 3 hours 5 minutes (not including troubleshooting time). Patching – The patching is on par with Mirantis in process and method. Very expensive for a start-up. If you are on a personal connection, like at home, you can run an anti-virus scan on your device to make sure it is not infected with malware. Mirantis scores reasonably well due to the completeness around a variety of factors related to resilience at scale. What is the difference between Mirantis and Red Hat distribution for OpenStack? These are the tools that should be called “day 2” in my mind, with scaling up/patching pushed down to “day 3”. It was so well received that we decided to write a follow-on blog. Mirantis takes upstream OpenStack code, rigorously tests it, applies additional fixes and enterprise-grade features, and packages the OpenStack services into VM images that are published on our Git repos and placed into our customers’ repositories for deployment into their staging and production environments. Mirantis has the overall advantage with a score of 62 to 53. Red Hat also offers OpenStack training, although it is specific to their distribution only. Mirantis gains a slight advantage here for their training offerings in both the pure-play community and distribution specific OpenStack, whereas Red Hat … Mirantis also develops all their code, bug fixes, etc. There are subjects you aren’t familiar with and yet you compare them ( = Testing!) While it performs as expected, there aren’t any shining features that benefit administrators in making their jobs easier or less involved. OpenStack, or any private cloud, is not an end in itself. Finally, which patches are included from trunk. Mirantis helps companies ship Kubernetes applications faster with one cohesive cloud experience, complete app and devops portability, and the industry's most secure container engine. Time required for installation and deployment, Frequency and types of tripping points/issues, Ease and automation of scaling the physical infrastructure up/down, the developer space is very fast-moving, and partnering with best-in-class vendors gives users maximum choice and flexibility; and, OpenShift based on Kubernetes is the right choice for PaaS; and, Availability of a documented framework for DIY plugins, Professional services and support offerings. However, the deployment of the plugins is completely manual; CLI commands are required on each node that the plugin affects, which can be an administrative nightmare in large-scale deployments. © 2005 - 2020 Mirantis, Inc. All rights reserved. There were very few issues along the path of installation. A few questions for comparison... What is the ratio of RHEL OpenStack customers vs. RHEV? Linux Platforms. For this reason, we are not treating Fuel as an OpenStack project in this blog to ensure that Mirantis doesn’t get an unfair advantage. The first company in Red Hat’s crosshairs appears to be Mirantis, an OpenStack pioneer that Red Hat backed as part of a $10 million funding round ... Red Hat Enterprise Linux OpenStack … There are three levels at which we look at packaging: The differences look like this — first, which projects are included. Reference architectures are a critical piece of a distro because these documents state what configurations and combinations are recommended and assure that they have been tested together. One aspect that is appreciated is the use of Ironic for bare metal node registration. There are eight areas that we compare here, including the two from the Tokyo summit session: We used only public documentation and available software. The OpenStack Foundation is a nonprofit organization that exists to guide the continued development of open source OpenStack software. Very expensive for a start-up. In this review we compare the stability enhancements of the two distributions. In this category, we look at the abilities for each distribution to scale up and down, patch an existing environment, and eventually upgrade it to the next major revision. Continuing operations for OpenStack is a different challenge to meet than the initial configuration and deployment, so we have broken it out separately. OpenStack - Open source software for building private and public clouds. You may need to download version 2.0 now from the Chrome Web Store. But, as a testament to Fuel’s network verification check, I was able to quickly diagnose and fix the issue. This includes installing the director, planning your environment, and creating an OpenStack environment with the director. In addition, Mirantis has a well-documented open-source framework for creating your own plugins for a truly pure-play, open source, customized experience to meet each use cases’ requirements. Another way to prevent getting this page in the future is to use Privacy Pass. Very informative blog. We start the review with Mirantis. 32 verified user reviews and ratings of features, pros, cons, pricing, support and more. Currently, the most common use cases for OpenStack are to manage private cloud, with 37% of CSPs doing so and as the basis for NFV, with 35% of CSPs doing so. The experience here was significantly difficult. However, the many errors in the documentation were unexpected. Total Steps: 12 mostly guided steps (includes some defaults, sub-steps, and 2 optional health verifications), Red Hat OpenStack Platform 7 with Director. The deployment engine built into Mirantis OpenStack, Fuel, can maintain management of multiple OpenStack environments, each at a different version. Training, certification, and professional services are available worldwide. While we believe this to be a relevant aspect of overall product distribution, given that we do not have visibility into Red Hat’s validation testing, this comparison is clearly inconclusive, so we are omitting this section from the scoring until we can gather more concrete data. Red Hat OpenStack Platform A leading open source cloud infrastructure project—stabilized for your enterprise. OpenStack's main competitors include Red Hat OpenShift, Virtustream, Red Hat, Mirantis and Vmware. Next, what middleware is packaged. Red Hat does have documentation on the processes required for upgrading their environment. Mirantis gains a slight advantage here for their training offerings in both the pure-play community and distribution specific OpenStack, whereas Red Hat only offers their distribution specific training. Our experience with these errors resulted in many showstoppers, such as failed installations and deployments with cryptic logs. You mentioned deploying time but didn’t elaborate on how exactly you measured it. Mirantis insists that partners revalidate their products with each major release (six-month cadence). OpenStack is used as a single point cloud-based platform. So, before starting to work with OpenStack you should decide which distribution to use: RedHat, Ubuntu, Mirantis or any other software provided as self-hosted solution or as a service. They also incorporate many community-approved open-source technology options (e.g., Ceph) in their regular distributions, in robust reference configurations, configured and deployed automatically with Fuel. Red Hat also scores reasonably well here. From start to finish, the preponderance of steps are pure CLI commands with a heavy dependence on the documentation. These include Docker Enterprise Container Cloud (now Mirantis Container Cloud), Docker Enterprise/UCP (now Mirantis Kubernetes Engine), Docker Engine - Enterprise (now Mirantis Container Runtime), and Docker Trusted Registry (now Mirantis Secure Registry). Scaling – Using Director and Ironic for node management and registration/discovery is more involved. Red Hat’s OpenStack distribution only supports a single overcloud environment per undercloud and Director seed node. Mirantis could also benefit heavily from a free "light" version that start-ups could use to run their own cloud.